A community-moderated platform for researchers to discuss, vote, and evaluate publishers, journals, and metrics to ensure academic integrity.
This analysis explores the toxic underlying dynamics of superficial politeness within academic publishing circles. It argues that maintaining a facade of civility often masks predatory practices and prevents genuine systemic accountability.
Read Article
This analysis explores how the OMB's new Uniform Guidance could unintentionally fuel predatory publishing landscapes by complicating legitimate federal funding for scholarly communication. We examine the structural risks that threaten to dismantle established academic societies while shifting control toward profit-driven entities.
Read Article
This analysis examines how automated agentic workflows inadvertently provide the perfect infrastructure for academic paper mills to scale their operations. It explores the tension between technical leverage and the essential human trust required to maintain scholarly integrity.
Read ArticleJoin our community-moderated effort to distinguish predatory from legitimate journals. Participate in discussions, cast your vote, and help fellow researchers evaluate the integrity of publishers worldwide.
Get StartedModerated by researchers like you
Rate and verify journal integrity
Spot deceptive practices early