A community-moderated platform for researchers to discuss, vote, and evaluate publishers, journals, and metrics to ensure academic integrity.
This analysis explores how private philanthropic interests increasingly dominate the digital commons under the guise of civic development. It challenges the assumption that corporate-backed infrastructure serves the public good without significant strings attached.
Read Article
This analysis explores how traditional open-access licensing is being exploited by large-scale artificial intelligence training models. It argues that the lack of reciprocity from AI developers creates a systemic imbalance that threatens the long-term sustainability of scholarly integrity.
Read Article
Evidence of systemic corruption in conference proceedings reveals how predatory editors exploit institutional loopholes. This analysis explores the total collapse of peer review standards when an editor authors 60% of their own volume.
Read ArticleJoin our community-moderated effort to distinguish predatory from legitimate journals. Participate in discussions, cast your vote, and help fellow researchers evaluate the integrity of publishers worldwide.
Get StartedModerated by researchers like you
Rate and verify journal integrity
Spot deceptive practices early